@article { author = {Mohseni, Hassan and Valaee, Mohammad and Taheri Lasku Kalayeh, Nilofar}, title = {The Problem of a Previous Opinion Expressed in a Case of Disqualification of a Judge; Confirmation of the validity of an auction: Procedural or Substantive Opinion (A Critique and Review of Judgment No. 140006290000446311, September 14, 2021 Made by Branch 14 of the Supreme Court)}, journal = {Critique and Analysis of Judicial Opinions}, volume = {1}, number = {1}, pages = {160-174}, year = {2022}, publisher = {Iranian Law and Legal Research Institute}, issn = {2821-1790}, eissn = {2821-1804}, doi = {10.22034/analysis.2022.253297}, abstract = {Abstract:There is as much discussion concerning implementation of regulations set forth in the Code of Civil Procedure regarding recusal of a judge during the enforcement of judgments as there is about the nature of orders and executive measures.In the aforementioned judgment, Branch 14 of the Supreme Court applies the rules of recusal of a judge both in the stage of enforcement of judgments and the establishment of the auction process, which is considered as one of the cases of expressing a previous opinion.According to the authors, the review of the judgment made by Branch 14 of the Supreme Court shows that although these orders and measures should not be considered as an expression of substantive opinion of a judge that prevents him from dealing with other claims about the same enforcement measures, this part of the judgment made by Branch 14, that correctly demonstrates the nature of entering an order of recusal, is affirmable.}, keywords = {KeyWords: impartiality,independence,enforcement measures,previous opinion}, title_fa = {مسأله اظهارنظر پیشین در رد دادرس تایید صحت مزایده؛ اظهار نظر شکلی یا ماهوی؟ (نقد و بررسی دادنامه شماره ۱۴۰۰۰۶۲۹۰۰۰۰۴۴۶۳۱۱ مورخ ۱۴۰۰/۰۶/۲۳ شعبه ۱۴ دیوان‌عالی کشور)}, abstract_fa = {درباره اجرای مقررات قانون آیین دادرسی مدنی پیرامون رد دادرس در جریان اجرای احکام همان قدر سخن هست که درباره ماهیت دستورها و اقدامات اجرایی. شعبه ۱۴ دیوان‌عالی کشور هم مقررات رد دادرس را در اجرا جاری می­داند و هم احراز صحت جریان مزایده را مصداق اظهارنظر پیشین که از موارد رد است، در این رأی دانسته است. به باور نگارندگان، نقد و بررسی رأی شعبه ۱۴ دیوان‌عالی کشور نشان می­دهد که گرچه این دستورها و اقدامات را نباید مصداق اظهارنظر ماهیتی دانست که مانع رسیدگی به دعاوی دیگر درباره همان عملیات اجرایی است، ولی این بخش از رأی شعبه ۱۴ که به درستی ماهیت قرار امتناع از رسیدگی را هویدا می­کند، تایید شدنی است.}, keywords_fa = {بی‌طرفی,استقلال,دستور اجرایی,اظهارنظر پیشین}, url = {https://analysis.illrc.ac.ir/article_253297.html}, eprint = {https://analysis.illrc.ac.ir/article_253297_cebbfa67f50faaa099ba71a2cb45370d.pdf} }