The Journal of Critical Analysis of Judicial Decisions

The Journal of Critical Analysis of Judicial Decisions

Judicial Review of Refugee and Adolescent Migrant Cases: The Conflict Between the Best Interests of the Child and Residency or Citizenship Rules (Case Study: Tehran Juvenile Court)

Document Type : A critique of the penal court's judgment

Authors
1 Associate Professor, Faculty of Theology and Law, Hazrat-e Masoumeh University, Qom,iran
2 Master's degree, Department of Law, Faculty of Theology and Law, Hazrat Masoumeh University, Qom, Iran
Abstract
Abstract

The issue of illegal migration and its legal consequences, particularly when children and adolescents are among the migrants, represents one of the most complex challenges for judicial and protective systems worldwide. In Iran, the significant presence of Afghan children and adolescents in uncertain residency situations necessitates special considerations within judicial processes to safeguard both their legal rights and their best interests. The ruling in case number 140168390014576263 by the Tehran Juvenile Court exemplifies this approach; in this decision, the judge prioritized the best interests of the Afghan adolescent involved and issued a judgment aimed at protecting the child’s future and dignity.

The ruling reflects a protection-oriented trend in judicial practice, demonstrating that it is possible to reconcile residency requirements with human rights considerations and the developmental needs of adolescents. In the text of the judgment, alongside adherence to public order and legal norms, the impact of the judicial decision on the child’s growth, education, and potential for reintegration or continued social life was taken into account, and appropriate protective measures were implemented accordingly. This approach not only serves the legal interests of the judiciary but also ensures effective fulfillment of international and ethical obligations regarding children’s rights.

The experience of this case can provide practical guidance for judges and relevant institutions, enabling them to adopt a realistic and child-centered perspective when handling similar cases, thereby promoting justice while mitigating the vulnerabilities of young migrants.
Keywords

 
1.Abedini, Abdollah; Meshkibaf, Mehdi (2021). The Status of the Best Interests in the Convention on the Rights of the Child and Iranian Family Laws. Quarterly Journal of Comparative Research on Islamic and Western Law, 6(4), 185-212 (in Persian).
2.Alipour Kivi, Hoda; Moazami, Shahla; Bashiriyeh, Tahmoures (2025). Re-examining Modern Patterns of Responding to Juvenile Delinquency in English Law with a View to Iranian Law. Quarterly Journal of Research and Development in Comparative Law, 8(26), 165-193doi: 10.22034/law.2024.2042804.1465 (in Persian).
3.Behboudi, Bahram; Aref, Mohammad (2019). Procedure for Handling Crimes of Children and Adolescents in the Preliminary Investigation Stage and Thereafter under the Criminal Procedure Code of 1392. Ara Journal, 2(15), 27-42 (in Persian).
4. ElSan, Mustafa (2008). Fair Trial for Children. Human Rights, 2(5), 171-188 (in Persian).
5.Elham, Gholamhossein; Manouchehri, Maryam (2014). Specialization of Proceedings in Juvenile Courts in Iran and Italy. Criminal Law and Criminology Studies, 1(1), 37-57 (in Persian).
6.Mehra, Nasrin (2020). Differentiation of Proceedings for Children and Adolescents in Iran. Scientific Quarterly of Police International Studies, 11(41), 54-75 (in Persian).
7.Mahdavi-Sabet, Mohammad Ali; Abdyan, Mohammad Reza (2018). Manifestations of Restorative Justice in the Prosecution and Investigation Stages of Crimes Committed by Children and Adolescents under the Criminal Procedure Code Approved in 1392. No. 95, 47-65 (in Persian).
8.Nekounam, Vahid (2021). Jurisdiction in Criminal Matters. Tehran: Majd (in Persian).
9.Parvin, Abolfazl; Hajidehabadi, Mohammad Ali (2025). Criminal Policy of Iran and Jordan Regarding Juvenile Delinquency. Biannual Journal of Development in Criminal Law and Criminology, 1-32 doi: 10.22034/jclc.2025.2058788.1185  (in Persian).
10.Sadeghi, Salar; Safarourangi, Ali (2021). Examination of In-Person and In-Absentia Judgments Issued by Juvenile Courts: Resolving Ambiguities. Quarterly Journal of Research and Development in Comparative Law, 4(12), 82-98 . doi: 10.22034/law.2021.534025.109 (in Persian).
Constitution Approved in 1979 (in Persian).
Criminal Procedure Code Approved in 2014 (in Persian).
Convention on the Rights of the Child 1989
Islamic Penal Code Approved in 2013 (in Persian).
Law on the Entry and Residence of Foreign Nationals in Iran Approved in 1931 (in Persian).