نوع مقاله : نقد رای دادگاه حقوقی
عنوان مقاله English
نویسنده English
The issuance of a strong and persuasive judgment is subject to the two dimensions of procedural strength and substantive firmness. If these two dimensions move in step with each other, they set forth an upright sturdy body. The greater the flaw in procedure and format and the deficiency in content and substance, the greater the extent to which the judgment is devoid of formal strength and deprived of the substantive firmness. Taking this consideration in mind the following critique and analysis has been presented. This article deals with the two aforementioned dimensions of the judgment in question. The results of the study using the aforementioned approach indicate the existence of some flaws in the judgment, the most important of which are delineated by descriptive and analytical methods.
From a procedural perspective, issues such as unnecessary length of text, use of inappropriate expressions, inaccuracy in enumeration of facts, and lack of coherence in the writing have been examined. In the substantive dimension, issues such as denying the right to object to value of relief sought, and raising unnecessary issues in the field of doctrine have been examined.
کلیدواژهها English
