In each issue of the Journal, a formal call is issued to judges of the Iranian judiciary, inviting them to submit their selected judicial decisions for scholarly review and consideration. Following the receipt of submissions and upon the expiration of the designated call period, the submitted decisions undergo a structured evaluation process conducted by the Journal’s reviewers and members of the Editorial Board. This process is designed to assess the legal reasoning, doctrinal significance, and practical impact of each decision.
At the conclusion of this evaluative stage, the decision that attains the highest overall score is designated as the Selected Judgment for that issue of the Journal. The judgment published in the present issue has been chosen through this competitive and merit-based process, reflecting its outstanding analytical depth, methodological rigor, and contribution to the development of judicial reasoning and legal doctrine.